Skip to content

CV Particle Assignment — Vocative and Attention-Signal

Theme: Grammar & syntax · 8 sentences.

← Grammar & syntax · ← Corpus


CVP-001 · CV Particle Assignment — Vocative and Attention-Signal

S524 he na-Moses! Standalone vocative: "Moses!"

Notes

he = vocative particle; na-Moses = proper name NP. The sentence is a complete speech act: a direct call. Three-way compare: (1) na-Moses! — exclamatory NP; still an NP, not an illocutionary act; (2) he na-Moses! — vocative speech act: I am calling you specifically; (3) la-na-Moses ka-si — "Moses spoke" (predicate clause; Moses is the agent, not the addressee). he is the only form that produces a standalone direct address at minimal length. First attestation of he (form newly assigned). CVP-001 count: 1.

S525 he na-Moses, ki di-pa-su Vocative + imperative: "Moses! Go toward the mountain."

Notes

he na-Moses = direct address frame; , separates it from the following imperative clause; ki di-pa-su = move toward / in the direction of the mountain (dropped-agent imperative, standard). The he makes it unambiguous that na-Moses is the addressee, not the agent of the following clause — which la-na-Moses, ki di-pa-su would confusingly suggest (Moses as agent of the motion). Second attestation. CVP-001 count: 2.

S526 he na-Moses! la-na-Moses pa EXO-001 divine call retest: the burning bush calling

Notes

Exodus 3:4 — God calls Moses by name ("Moses! Moses!"); Moses replies "Here I am." he na-Moses! = the bare call itself; a standalone speech act unavailable in the current system without a full predicate clause. la-na-Moses pa = Moses is present / Moses replies (existential pa, established). Compare S404 (la-Elohim ka-si lo-na-Moses = "Elohim signaled to Moses" — a propositional clause, not a call). The he form recovers the calling register that the S404 formulation encodes only as a report. Third attestation. Admission threshold met (3 corpus sentences, distinct contexts). CVP-001 count: 3.

S527 na-Moses! [exclamatory NP — still an NP; not a speech act] he na-Moses! [vocative speech act — direct call] la-na-Moses ka-si ["Moses spoke" — predicate clause; Moses is agent] DIAGNOSTIC: he na-X vs na-X! vs la-na-X

S528 ya, go-no-fe helms vo Standalone attention-signal before a major claim

Notes

ya = attention-signal particle; , separates; go-no-fe helms vo = "God is by definition love" (1 John 4:8, established from S499 context). ya here = "mark this / attend to what follows." No emotional assertion — pure content-direction. The interlocutor's field of attention is drawn outward toward the claim, not toward the speaker's affective state. Compare fa-be! ("my affect rises!") — ya asserts nothing about the speaker. First attestation of ya (form newly assigned). CVP-001 count: 4.

S529 ya, la-zo-se-ma ki lo-re-fe-ma-ki Attention-signal before an event (Bashō register)

Notes

ya, [event] = "[look] — a frog jumped into the old pond." ya directs attention to the incoming event; the speaker's affective response is not asserted, only the redirection of the listener's attention to what is about to be named. This is the natural opener for any event or revelation that the speaker wants the listener to notice before it is stated. In haiku register: ya recovers the kireji-like pause-before-content that e, ... was originally proposed for in VPT-001 (S498). Second attestation. CVP-001 count: 5.

S530 he na-Moses, ki di-pa-su [you — go toward the mountain] ya, ki di-pa-su [look — go toward the mountain] DIAGNOSTIC: ya vs he head-to-head

S531 ya — la-mi to lo-ze ya + prosodic combination

Notes

ya (attention drawn); (suspension, held breath); la-mi to lo-ze (I know it — the revelation arrives). Three stages: attention, suspension, arrival. Tests whether ya and interact cleanly. They do: ya is a CV word in isolation; is a punctuation mark external to compound structure; la-mi to lo-ze is the clause that arrives from the held state. No parse ambiguity arises. The combination produces a rhetoric not available from either mark alone: the speaker draws attention, then holds before delivering the claim — the is not a fresh suspension but a continuation of the attentional arc opened by ya. ya + combination attested. ya admitted as G030.

Batch Summary

Entry Form Verdict Note
S524 (CVP-001-A) he first attestation standalone call; na-X is NP; he na-X is speech act
S525 (CVP-001-B) he second attestation vocative + imperative; addressee ≠ agent
S526 (CVP-001-C) he threshold met EXO-001 burning bush call; OQ-V-001 resolved
S527 (CVP-001-D) he diagnostic three-way na-X! / he na-X! / la-na-X compared; he unique
S528 (CVP-001-E) ya first attestation content-directed attention marker; no affect assert
S529 (CVP-001-F) ya second attestation event-attention opener; Bashō register
S530 (CVP-001-G) ya threshold met ya vs he non-interchangeable; OQ-V-002 resolved
S531 (CVP-001-H) ya combination ya + combination clean; ya admitted as G030

Running total: S524–S531 (8 sentences).


Generated from registry/entries.yaml.