Skip to content

King Arthur — Sword in the Stone

Theme: Foundations · 23 sentences.

Full translation analysis

← Foundations · ← Corpus


KAR-001 · King Arthur — Sword in the Stone

S1016 Only the person who draws SwordInStone is ruler.

S1017 The others do not draw SwordInStone.

S1018 Arthur draws SwordInStone.

S1019 The people have a signal that Arthur drew SwordInStone, but they do not yet hold it as established that Arthur is ruler.

S1020 The people call to Arthur so that he will draw SwordInStone again.

S1021 Arthur draws SwordInStone again, and the people see him.

S1022 Because Arthur draws SwordInStone again and the people witness him, the people hold it established that Arthur is ruler.

S1023 SwordInStone does not create a ruler; the people classify Arthur as ruler through it.

Batch Summary

Entries: S1016–S1023 · New vocabulary: none

Entry Source focus Tonesu Key feature
S1016 (KAR-001-A) exclusive rule ru-fe, la-ze ki lo-na SwordInStone ne ra-su-li accession criterion stated as exclusivity
S1017 (KAR-001-B) others fail la-o-li no ki lo-na SwordInStone criterion gains force through exclusion
S1018 (KAR-001-C) Arthur draws la-na Arthur ki lo-na SwordInStone bare event
S1019 (KAR-001-D) signal, not yet conclusion la-o-li si [la-na Arthur ki lo-na SwordInStone] / no-to [la-na Arthur ne ra-su-li] si vs to legitimacy gap
S1020 (KAR-001-E) demand repetition la-o-li ka-si lo-na Arthur / wi [la-na Arthur ki lo-na SwordInStone re] repetition as public verification
S1021 (KAR-001-F) repeated witnessed act la-na Arthur ki lo-na SwordInStone re ; la-o-li se lo-na Arthur witness enters the proof chain
S1022 (KAR-001-G) public establishment go {la-na Arthur ki lo-na SwordInStone re ; la-o-li se lo-na Arthur}, la-o-li to [la-na Arthur ne ra-su-li] causal bridge from sign to accepted rule
S1023 (KAR-001-H) classification la-na SwordInStone no be lo-ra-su-li / la-o-li wi-fe'ka-to-fe lo-na Arthur ne ra-su-li kingship as category assignment

Key structural findings:

Finding 1: the Arthurian scene is epistemic before it is heroic. The real pressure is not "can someone move the sword?" but "when does a witnessed act count as enough to establish rule?"

Finding 2: repetition is politically load-bearing. The second drawing is not redundant. It is the mechanism that turns a surprising event into a shared public proof.

Finding 3: Tonesu cleanly separates sign from accepted legitimacy. S1019 and S1022 show the full movement from si to to: visible signal first, established collective conclusion later.

Finding 4: kingship is treated as a category assigned by the polity, not a mystical substance emitted by the sword. wi-fe'ka-to-fe states that directly and more honestly than the legend's surface phrasing.

KAR-002 · King Arthur — Round Table

S1024 Arthur establishes RoundTable, and RoundTable is a council.

S1025 RoundTable establishes equal standing among council-members.

S1026 Arthur is ruler, and the council stands in equal relation.

S1027 The council speaks to Arthur, and Arthur speaks to the council.

S1028 RoundTable does not abolish rulership; it contains rulership by means of council.

Batch Summary

Entries: S1024–S1028 · New vocabulary: none

Entry Source focus Tonesu Key feature
S1024 (KAR-002-A) council established la-na Arthur ka-be lo-na RoundTable / lo-na RoundTable ne li-pu Round Table treated as institution
S1025 (KAR-002-B) equal standing la-na RoundTable be lo-li-pu-li su-ne su-ne marks relational parity
S1026 (KAR-002-C) king plus equal council la-na Arthur ne ra-su-li / la-li-pu ne su-ne rule and parity coexist
S1027 (KAR-002-D) reciprocal deliberation la-li-pu ka-si lo-na Arthur ; la-na Arthur ka-si lo-li-pu counsel flows both directions
S1028 (KAR-002-E) bounded kingship la-na RoundTable no de lo-ra-su-li / ko lo-ra-su-li go-si li-pu power is contained within counsel

Key structural findings:

Finding 1: the Round Table is a governance-form before it is an image. What matters is not the table as object but the council relation it institutes.

Finding 2: Tonesu can distinguish office from standing. Arthur remains ra-su-li, while the council is su-ne. Those are different claims, and the legend depends on keeping both.

Finding 3: shared deliberation is structurally visible. S1027 makes the political reciprocity explicit: rule is not represented as a silent ornament of hierarchy.

Finding 4: the strongest reading is bounded kingship, not proto-democracy. The Round Table does not negate rule; it contains rule in counsel and prevents visible precedence from becoming the whole constitution.

KAR-003 · King Arthur — Betrayal and Court Fracture

S1029 Mordred wills secrecy.

S1030 Mordred betrays the ruler.

S1031 Because Mordred wills secrecy and betrays the ruler, the council no longer stands in equal relation.

S1032 The council no longer speaks to Arthur, and Arthur no longer speaks to the council.

S1033 RoundTable does not decay; the council decays.

Batch Summary

Entries: S1029–S1033 · New vocabulary: none

Entry Source focus Tonesu Key feature
S1029 (KAR-003-A) secrecy la-na Mordred wi lo-to-no-si secrecy enters counsel
S1030 (KAR-003-B) betrayal la-na Mordred ka-ne-de lo-ne-ra-su-li betrayal as deliberate bond dissolution
S1031 (KAR-003-C) parity collapses go {la-na Mordred wi lo-to-no-si ; la-na Mordred ka-ne-de lo-ne-ra-su-li}, la-li-pu no ne su-ne su-ne depends on trust
S1032 (KAR-003-D) reciprocal counsel fails la-li-pu no ka-si lo-na Arthur ; la-na Arthur no ka-si lo-li-pu dialogical rule breaks
S1033 (KAR-003-E) institution decays lo-na RoundTable no de / lo-li-pu de form survives while counsel fails

Key structural findings:

Finding 1: the failure begins before open war. Secrecy and betrayal are already enough to break the Round Table's governing logic.

Finding 2: equal standing is not ornamental. su-ne depends on public trust; once hidden disloyalty enters, equality stops being true even if the room still looks the same.

Finding 3: the cleanest failure sign is loss of reciprocal speech. When council no longer addresses ruler and ruler no longer addresses council, the institution has already failed as counsel.

Finding 4: Tonesu separates constitutional form from institutional health. S1033 states that directly: the Round Table as visible form may remain, while the council as political relation decays.

KAR-004 · King Arthur — Final Battle and Fall

S1034 Arthur fights Mordred, and Mordred fights Arthur.

S1035 Because combat has come, persons kill persons.

S1036 Mordred kills Arthur.

S1037 Arthur kills Mordred, and Arthur dies.

S1038 Because Arthur dies and the council decays, governance decays.

Batch Summary

Entries: S1034–S1038 · New vocabulary: none

Entry Source focus Tonesu Key feature
S1034 (KAR-004-A) final battle opens la-na Arthur ka-ra lo-na Mordred ; la-na Mordred ka-ra lo-na Arthur combat becomes explicit
S1035 (KAR-004-B) civil war go {ka-ra}, la-o-li ka-de-zo lo-li combat normalizes killing
S1036 (KAR-004-C) Arthur falls la-na Mordred ka-de-zo lo-na Arthur betrayal culminates in killing
S1037 (KAR-004-D) Mordred falls, Arthur dies la-na Arthur ka-de-zo lo-na Mordred ; la-na Arthur ne de-zo kill vs death distinguished
S1038 (KAR-004-E) rule collapses go {la-na Arthur ne de-zo ; lo-li-pu de}, lo-ka-li-su de governance decay as terminal outcome

Key structural findings:

Finding 1: the last Arthur step is not just battle but conversion of politics into combat. Once counsel fails, force becomes the only remaining grammar of rule.

Finding 2: Tonesu keeps killing and death distinct. ka-de-zo names deliberate lethal action; de-zo names the terminal death-state that follows.

Finding 3: civil war is structurally clearer than heroic duel. S1035 makes the important claim: when combat enters the polity, persons kill persons inside the same social field.

Finding 4: the true ending is governance decay. The Arthurian fall is complete only when the ruler dies and lo-ka-li-su itself decays.


Generated from registry/entries.yaml.