to-fe-su-ki · W097

tofesuki · epistemic ruling crossing to public force · ✅

← Word Registry · Building words

Domain	knowledge / institutions / ethics
Class	event / process
Type	inchoative / event
Register	formal / institutional
First use	S128 (CF-001-C): to-go [lo-to-re-su to-fe-su-ki ti-de] lo-ne-fe de ti-de — "If the doctrine had been published, the dispute would have been resolved." Also S131 (CF-001-F): same construction, confirmed.

Composition

to-fe-su (W072, epistemic standards body/code) + ki (motion/becoming)

Definition

The inchoative event of an epistemic standards ruling crossing from internal adoption into published to-su status — openly challengeable by any party. Bare to-fe-su names the body or its unpublished internal standards; to-fe-su-ki names the specific event/state-transition: the moment the standard becomes public and adjudicable. An internal ruling that has not undergone to-fe-su-ki is unchallengeable; one that has is subject to the normal epistemic-accountability framework. This distinction resolves the institutional-capture problem: a standards body can only bind others with rules that have passed through to-fe-su-ki. The self-applying principle holds: to-fe-su's own operating rules must themselves undergo to-fe-su-ki to be legitimately binding (see notes/semantic-map.md § Domain 6, binding principle).

Notes

Flagged as a candidate at W072 registration. Corpus demand satisfied: S128 and S131 both use the form before it was registered — retroactive first-use assignment.

Related

to-fe-su (W072), ki (becoming/motion), to-su (organized knowledge), to-fe-li (W032)

In the corpus

7 attestations.

S#	Tonesu
S128	la-mi to [go [lo-to-re-su to-fe-su-ki ti-de] lo-ne-fe de ti-de] My conceptual model: given [the doctrine having been published], the relational tension would have dissolved.
S131	to-go [lo-to-re-su to-fe-su-ki ti-de] lo-ne-fe de ti-de Counterfactually, given that the doctrine had been published, the relational tension would have dissolved.
S159	to lo-go-su be. lo-si no be ti-de. la-li-pu no se lo-si ti-de. la-li-pu no ka fe-si ti-de. to lo-go-su de. la-to-fe-su ka to-fe-su-ki lo-go-su ti-de. [The causal analysis model is now active.] The signal had not arrived. The crew had not received it. The crew had not issued the warning. [Causal analysis model closes.] The investigation body then published the causal analysis.
S389	(la-to-fe-su lo-ra-ma-de se) , · la-mi to lo-ra-ma-de de , · go [lo-ra-ma-de de] , · (du lo-ne-su mu-be) , · (du lo-ka-li-su de-fe) , · lo-ka-li-su-mi : la-mi lo-zo-li vo wi , · na-Kur : · (la-na-Kur la-to-fe-su-ki (la-to-li lo-ra-ma-de de si) re-ka) , · la-na-Kur lo-ra-ma-de de to , · go [(la-mi se lo-ra-ma-de de)] , · (du la-mi lo-ka-li-su wi) , · (du la-mi lo-ka-li-su to) "The authorities have reported signs of food insecurity. I am certain food is failing. This will cause social trust to erode and governance to collapse. As for my governance — I'm committed to the people's wellbeing. As for my opponent Kur — there are reports that he announced that a scholar reportedly thinks the food supply might be declining. Kur is certain food is decaying. [Given my weak basis for concern:] therefore I will govern. Therefore I am certain I should govern."
S966	go {lo-to-fe-su no to-fe-su-ki}, wi-fe-ka [la-o-ka-su ka-ko lo-na Kogami] An unpublished threshold standard cannot bind.
S967	go {lo-to-fe-su no to-fe-su-ki ; la-o-ka-su ka-de lo-na Kogami go-si [la-na Sibyl si [lo-na Kogami fa-ra-be nu-be lo-si-fe]]}, la-o-ka-su ne to-fe-ka Unpublished threshold plus lethal enforcement is epistemic abuse.
S968	la-wi-fe-su no to-su-ki lo-to-fe {si ; su-ka ; ka-ko ; ka-de} / ke, lo-to-fe-su ne-fe to-fe-su-ki ; la-o-ka-su ne-fe lo-ka-si lo-to-fe-li Structural verdict: Psycho-Pass collapses signal, category, and punishment.
---

Generated from registry/entries.yaml.