`to-fe` · W028

tofe · epistemic boundary (the-line between knowledge states) · ⏳


Domain	knowledge / ethics
Class	entity / concept
Type	compound
Register	formal
First use	S273

Composition

to (knowledge/pattern) + fe (boundary/limit/category) — knowledge-boundary; the edge between one epistemic status and the next

Definition

epistemic boundary; the categorical line between epistemic states; the principle that se/si/to/to-su are not interchangeable

Notes

Does not denote a boundary in physical space but a boundary in epistemic category. The root fe already covers all category-edges (physical, temporal, abstract); to-fe specifies the knowledge-category application. Derived forms: to-fe-ki (unintentional epistemic category confusion; honest error, accidental — entered a wrong epistemic category); to-fe-ka (deliberate epistemic boundary violation; see W029). The distinction between to-fe-ki and to-fe-ka mirrors Domain 2: the same ki/ka pair that separates natural transition from deliberate action.

to (W—), fe (primitive), to-fe-ka (W029)

Examples

"the to-fe between observation and knowledge is fundamental to Tonesu discourse"

In the corpus

14 attestations.

S#	Tonesu
S273	`la-to-fe-li to-fe ro-to lo-go-li` The arbiter delivered judgment on the basis of [full] knowledge of the cause-person. (convicted on proof beyond reasonable doubt)
S274	`la-~to-go no-go lo-to-fe` Approximately knowing the cause does not produce a verdict. (probable cause is insufficient for judgment)
S277	`la-to-fe-li to-fe lo-to-ne-go ne go-li` The arbiter determined the established causal connection concerning the cause-person. (delivered the verdict: found the perpetrator guilty)
S364	`P1: lo-ra to-fe ne P2: lo-wi-fe lo-la-wi-li go ne C: (lo-ra lo-la-wi-li go ne)` P1: Force obeys an epistemic regularity. P2: Normative rules require a willer. C: (So it is claimed: force requires a willer.)
S642	`la-wi-fe no to-su-ki lo-to-fe su-ka-li ne si-go-li` The rule has not comprehended the boundary between service-provider and content-originator.
S644	`la-wi-fe ne wi-fe'ka-to-fe / ke, la-wi-fe no to-su-ki lo-to-fe su-ka-li ne si-go-li` The rule is a prescription about categorization / but the rule has not defined the boundary between service-provider and content-originator.
S648	`lo-wi-fe'de ne to-fe wi-fe'de / ne to-fe ka-li-de` The payment sits at the boundary of being a penalty / and at the boundary of being a tax.
S650	`~wi-fe'de ne su-to / ke, wi-fe no to-su-ki lo-to-fe wi-fe'de ne ka-li-de` `~wi-fe'de` is a structural fact / but the rule has not comprehended the boundary between penalty and tax.
S869	`la-wife'atofeka no ne to-fe ; la-wife'atofeka ne to-su` "Legitimized epistemic closure does not present as a knowledge-limit; it presents as the structure of knowledge itself."
S945	`la-wi-fe-su ne no-su-to / ke, la-wi-fe-su no to-su-ki lo-to-fe {wi-ra ; wi-fe ; si ; to}` Structural verdict on the classic hierarchy.
S956	`la-wi-fe-su no to-su-ki lo-to-fe {wi-ra ; si ; to} / ke, la-mu ne-fe lo-ka-si lo-to-fe-li` Structural verdict: edge cases require routing before coercion.
S962	`la-wi-fe-su no to-su-ki lo-to-fe {si ; ti-be ; de-su ; ka-ko} / ke, la-o-ka-su ne-fe lo-ka-si lo-to-fe-li` Structural verdict: pre-crime collapses prediction, fault, and punishment.
S968	`la-wi-fe-su no to-su-ki lo-to-fe {si ; su-ka ; ka-ko ; ka-de} / ke, lo-to-fe-su ne-fe to-fe-su-ki ; la-o-ka-su ne-fe lo-ka-si lo-to-fe-li` Structural verdict: Psycho-Pass collapses signal, category, and punishment.
S974	`la-to-su lo-wi-ra-su ne no-su-to / ke, la-to-su lo-wi-ra-su no to-su-ki lo-to-fe {ki ; be ; se} ne {de-zo ; pa ; ra ; to ; ge}` The legacy school list does not comprehend the boundary between operator and domain.
---

Generated from registry/entries.yaml.

to-fe · W028